What is game?

A student asked me, what is game? Game is like this combination lock. Every single section of the numbers are stages. Every girl during each stage, you have to calibrate. I have several openers depending on her reaction, smiling, polite, frowning. How much to tease. How much social comfort. How much challenge to deal with her emotional investment questions. How much progressive escalation. Meaning more romantic or sexual vibe. Game is really trying to find this combination that works for your LMS (looks, money and status). Then unlocking the girls compliance with your adaptive structural game. If you were doing natural and direct bullshit. Then of course, your combination would have three sets of numbers. Openers, vibes and number close. This is a filter game. While my game has more stages you have to go through. I can date girls higher on the looks scale. Do what works to get that lock open. It means structurally adaptive. Not just conversationally adaptive like intermediate LMS natural and direct game.

Game begins by your looks scale. Then it is leveled against your level of game. If you give a direct compliment. You are going for HB 7.5/10 or below. You use my openers, you are going for HB 8.5/10 or above. The style of game would determine your girls level of looks.  Since natural and direct game is about having LMS or higher level. Vs your vibing her with a simple conversation. You can’t get anyone higher on the scale than your looks. Just try not to screw it up. My style of game, plus the progressive escalation would push up the score. Once you get her hooked, you can move up the looks scale. So it is your looks scale and game leveled against her LMS or LS, looks status. How much money she makes has no effect on us liking her or not. Her status might be her race.

How to daygame if you are short?

Lately I have a few Skype students who are 5’2 and interested in skype coaching. I’ll offer my insight into this. Lets not be dishonest, being shorter is really going to make daygame a lot harder. Women are shallow and do judge my physical appearance. They want to feel protected and they look for a preselected by other women guy. Which usually means a tall guy. Also, if you look around all the couples, almost always it is tall guys who are in relationships. Since Vancouver is either night game (night clubs) or social circle game. Women are not aware they are going for super tall guys. It is just in their nature. Yes being yourself is important. But she can’t see your value if you can’t demonstrate it. Besides, everyone from 5’2 -5’4 gets the same reaction from women. A negative one. Everyone from 5’5-5’7 gets a bit more compliance but not much more. I fit into this category being 5’7 myself. Once you are 5’9-6’3, you have way more compliance. Your race, or other factors doesn’t matter as much. You are taller than the national average of 5’9. I mean if you pair that with being Asian and short. You will face an uphill battle in game.

For the physical changes, get heel lifts. They are things you put into your soles of your shoes or boots. I wear them. I am not stupid to daygame without it. The extra inch and a half of height, although not 5’9 yet, does matter. Of course if you are skinny already. Boosting your height really makes you look lanky. Wear fitted clothing. Baggy clothing makes you seem like you are socially unintuitive. Slim jeans and fitted shirts without stupid logos on it would help. Have spiky hair. Also, go to the gym. People are saying I don’t want to be bulky. I say, what makes you think with such a small frame you would get bulky? For every inch you lack in terms of height from the national average of 5’9. You have to be much wider and more ripped. If you look like you are on steroids, all the more better. To be honest, I fucking hate going to the gym. I haven’t been to the gym in the last two weeks. I pay for this shit weekly. But I still go because I know girls are shallow and they like muscles. I even work out at home. I do 300-500 rep exercises on one body part a day to shock my system. I figured if I do that everyday, I would expand my mental toughness. But that is part of a new from beta to alpha program I am developing. Just trust me, get to the gym. I mean honestly, what makes you think you deserve to date hot women? What have you done really for the deserve  it factor?

Mentally I have a program to deal with inner game issues. Like limiting beliefs. Also I would teach you how to reframe those beliefs. Then use those limiting beliefs combined with my inner game affirmations. We would smash though those limiting beliefs holding you back. I would also create visualization exercises so you can imagine yourself with the success. Even if you can’t now.

For game, you would never use direct game again in your life. Unless you open and she is smiling at you. Then go direct. Otherwise when she is polite, you would go situational openers. When she is frowning you would go indirect. They all transition back into the same path of game. It is a very adaptive structured style. You really have to be more dominant if you are short. If you are too tall, you have to play the gentleman. You really have to break negative stereotypes.

Daygame isn’t for everyone. You should use social game. I heard from other short PUAs they had some success from social game and parties. Maybe you should consider bar game or night game too. I like to train you in daygame if you think you can do it. While shorter students do struggle with game no matter what style. I would like to give you the best fighting chance. At least I am honest about it. Unlike other snake oil salesman who says height doesn’t matter.






Never daygame deformed looking girls.

Out of all girls, the ones who rejects the hardest in daygame are deformed looking girls. If she has a long face, hooked nose, weird eyes, squared jawline or something structurally wrong. I wrote this post after daygaming Grandville at night after a Drake concert. I got some harsh rejections from women who looks beautiful far away, but deformed looking close up. Weird eye bags, squared jawlines, protruding faces on the side, puffy looking face. I swear, I was in a horror movie. This women, my wingman pointed out, saying is she Russian. Hearing the word Russian I wanted to talk to her. When she looked to the side, her face pointed out really far for her nose and mouth. Maybe all the hot girls after the concert went home because it ended at 11. So they filtered out and what remains is the trash. Such a big concert doesn’t happen very often. The situation is rare, so I get to experience this firsthand. They have the least cool attitude towards pickup because they rarely get guys hitting on them. All the times I ever got in trouble dealing with girls, they all had ugly faces. Even if you go for girls who are 6.5/10 or 8/10 on the looks scale to practice daygame. Just make sure they aren’t deformed. Or they will act uncool.

Daygame. Should you go for quality, or quantity?

There are pros and cons for each option. Go for prettier girls at the beginning. Vs uglier ones, but still gaining reference experience. It really depends on your looks scale. If you are a good looking 6’0, strong natural and direct guy. Even if you go for girls below your looks, they are still attractive enough. In my teaching experience. The delusional hard case guys who are always universally 4/10 for looks. They always believe they are 8/10 in looks. Always goes after women who are 9/10. They say, but I can’t go for her, I am not attracted to her. That is unrealistic. It really depends on the type of women who would come out on a date with you. Who was the most attractive? Even though you might not had a date before from daygame. Whatever their looks are on the scale is what you should go for

It is all about leveling. It would be your LMS looks scale (Preselection/protector status/game) vs her looks and status. LMS vs LS. If your game sucks, at certain stages. It would take your existing looks and lower it. Even if a male model student has bad game, or gamey style game. Yeah I have trained students who are a model. It affects their results. If you play LMS game, you can only get a girl below your looks scale. Let’s say there is a dating coach out there who basically pulls girls who are 6.5/10.  However, whenever he runs into a 7/10 white girl. He never pulls her, except when he uses a lesbian pickup artist as a wing. Or uses night game. His height, looks might be 7/10. But his natural and direct game might be lowering his overall level. If a girl is 7/10, a compliment works just fine. If you want to game girls higher on the scale that would never work. People say the openers are not important. But it is very important, it sets the frame or scale. Your level vs her level. The openers I teach works on girls who are HB 8/10 or HB 9/10. I have a nice face, so I can date girls who are higher on the looks scale. But I don’t have a nice body, which means I won’t attract curvier women. You attract what you are. But if you had an okay face, but nice body. You would attract butter faced women with nice body.

I’m different, I went for the highest, prettiest and younger women. I got rejected more in the beginning. But it helped me develop a tighter game. If you go this route, you will suffer more rejections. You will be tempted for the easy route. But you will develop strength you would later reap the benefits. It would be easier to game below that scale too. You give up time, maybe even up to a year or two of consistent results. You would be able to game maybe girls. This is the style I teach to my student. Situational, adaptive structured game. They always get more results this way. I usually date girls above my looks and status scale.

Or you go for the easy pulls. The quantity over quality.  Many guys who are so-called natural and direct tall guys goes for yes girls. It is a game of filtering yes girls.  However, their game will be limited because they can’t grow past adapting to every girl. It is the same tactic of flexing your muscles and vibbing. But that can only get girls below your looks scale. Most of the time, those guys goes for the 6.5/10. They never get a girl higher on the looks scale. Over time you are getting results and reference experience. It is like night game, easier than daygame. People goes for the easy pulls, will be pulled in to keep going for the easy pulls. They will soon hit a plateau and they fucked themselves over in the long run. For some reason never seem to want to go after higher level girls. They already leveled themselves down to 6.5/10. This might be better in the beginning to get some reference experience. So when the hot girl comes along, you already have experience to pull. But most of these guys never goes for her. They cling to mediocrity. You always have to level up.

Which route you choose is up to you. If you can’t be happy with a 6.5/10, then don’t learn natural and direct game. If you don’t mind, then by all means go for it. You can always do things to improve your overall aesthetics. Like fashion, working out, hairstyle, improving your game. It is really about the deserve it factor. Do you deserve an attractive women? What are you doing to attract them? Your 9/10 might be my 7.5/10. Vice versa. No universal scale. At the end of the day, it is whatever makes you happy.

Text game does actually exist. Not all point A to point B or improving the interaction. (As tall strong white LMS dating coaches tells you)

In my experience, text game does exist. Those who doesn’t believe in text game tends to have squared jawlines. Are 6’0 tall and over. Are white in terms of status. Or they have more muscles than you. If you are a skinny Asian guy like me going for hot white girls, any mistakes you lose your poker chips in your bank account. Image it is a game of poker. Every time you ask her out for a coffee, you are going all in. It is a call to action which drain your poker chips. The higher your LMS is, or protector/preselection status or race status. The more compliance you would get. You initially only get  four responses anyway universally. Radio silence, a shit test (testing your frame, like, “do you approach girls all the time”), polite conversation and her emotionally investing. The way I teach my students about text game. Of course have a good interaction. Social comfort or connection goes a long way. If you build only attraction, or bt spike. That means spiking up her emotions. She might not feel it the next day. You focus only on social comfort or connection. You become very platonic. You focus only on seduction, you put yourself into the lover category. But it is hard to game girls who are higher on the looks scale. I had a good looking wingman who gamed girls slightly lower on the looks scale. While it isn’t bad, I would never date those girls.

I like to think of text game as fishing. You have to bait her, hook her, pull her up to the surface with vibes, then reel her in or release her. Meaning you are willing to let her go, or show a wiliness to walk away. This hooks her more. That is how I teach my students.

Ultimately it comes down to you fitting into her world. Of course you want to make the interaction good. But try fitting into her world by being a lover, boyfriend/provider/beta, or friendzoned loser, or trying to be her dad. The protecting caring nurturing figure, which is a lot like provider. Not every guy is buffed or strong, or fits into these criteria. You would have less social capital or poker chips to invest. Any mistakes you made during the texting phase. Like being too boring can get you radio silence. Not every guy makes enough money to be a provider. Also, she might not want you in her social circle as a friend. Or an oribitor she can choose from. Since most of the time in Vancouver, she picks the tallest guy in her social circle. She doesn’t know she is attracted to protector status and preselection. Women doesn’t know what they want. At the time I am writing this. The girl I had a same day lay with, replied to radio silence. You always assume the girl likes you, but is sucking someone else’s dick. Now I planted seeds for a future interaction. She just got into a relationship now. But she is mine again in the future. It’s about social capital. Text game exist. The same stupid people saying it is all in the interaction.