Category: Game

Change the sequence. For white people, black or Latinos. Positive stereotypes. They just have to 1. Learn game. 2. Improve fashion 3. Get a pull location 4. Inner game. 5. Work out. I get it because they don’t acknowledge they have LMS or looks, money status. Game and fashion would be enough. I say for Asian guys. Seeing how all 8 Asian guy, white girl couple I seen this summer. The guy is tall or strong, either or. The sequence should be 1. Work out for 3 months, compensate 2. Inner game mindset. 3. Improve fashion. 4. Get a pull location 5. learn game. Asian guys are so dead last, they are so dominated and defeated in the media. By Asian women with white guys couples. By white women.

Besides the 8 Asian man, white women couples this year. Last year I saw 25 couples or more. Yes it is getting worst based on this years trends. I have gone out daygaming a lot this summer. I had three Asian students get pulls and f-closes. They either were bulky strong and unattractive. Or tall and handsome, but not strong. Or a mixture of both qualities. But the other Asians who failed, were hardcases who refused to bulk up. This is a very important post for priorities. It might be better to take three months to bulk up before you get into game. I’m sure there are “many ways” to get bigger.

For a white guy, he just has to learn game first of all. Then improve his fashion, inner game and he is set. He already has LMS. There is a community divide between LMS and game. I say they both matter. But they already have status being white. Most likely they aren’t short either as Asians. A change in fashion helps them open sets. Just by learning a bit of game, they get some results.

Have you ever noticed most Asian daygame coaches are always super tall? (Protector status and preselection) There is a reason they succeed more than shorter coaches who gets flaked on a lot more. Yes most women are shallow. It isn’t their fault. Imagine how nice a women looks doing yoga. Now imagine how they think about men, working out. It is the same thing. Most of these positive stereotype coaches are bigger than the general white population. Not to mention stronger than most white guys. Plus having more game. I use that term loosely of tall strong direct game Asian guys. They can get away with less game.

Also, ever notice some Asian guys either have extremely high standards or extremely low? I suggest they start off with lower LMS women who they would still sleep with if they were naked in front of them. She doesn’t have to be perfect. This gives reference experience. Then raise the score later on. This would make you less needy and improve your vibe. But I also noticed those who stays in their comfortzone of 6.5/10 looking women. Yes I use a scale and believe in it. Your LMS sets your scale for you looks. Then your game will either move it up or down. It is a concept of levelling.

Solution, think of daygame as a long term self improvement project as an Asian guy. The faster you acknowledge looks do matter. Being a positive stereotype does matter. That working out helps. For every inch you are lower than the 5’9 average height of males in North America. The more you compensate. The faster you would succeed. Even if you are tall, but over weight. Or not a positive stereotype. Lose weight, slim down, fix your fashion, inner game then work on game. While there are no shortcut, you can focus on the most important paraeto principles. Which are muscles first, inner game, aesthetics, inner game then actual daygame.

update, in 2019, the lay rate is much higher and the bootcamp rate is much higher. This article was written in 2016.

When I joined another company, I got more clients. My students pull or lay for bootcamps is 97%. Only a few students didn’t get results. Of course during the first few years it wasn’t as high, I didn’t start the counter then. I was still learning and field testing every system.

Out of all the students about 80% already pulled and 72% got laid. Its like most of them. I used to get 10 testimonials a week in the past when I had more students. But its been pretty crazy. For most daygame coaches getting even one student laid or two is a miracle during their training period.

 

I’m only talking about the summer. But 75% of my students have pulled. A pull is bringing a girl back to your bedroom. A f-close means putting it in. Regardless, the percentage keeps going up. Today I talked to my first student. He finally got his first daygame f-close. He f-closed nearly 10 girls from night game. He applied his skills to daygame and it worked. He even got a girlfriend out of it before. Sorry I am writing about you, but I am proud. My other students are getting a pull on the first day of training from a date. While others are having their first date in two or one classes. This is probably the highest success rate in Vancouver for dating coaches for daygame students. I don’t just post pictures of testimonials from mediocre achievements like getting a phone number (flaky most likely) a date or a pull. I don’t have low goals for my students. I have high expectations.

What makes my students so successful? None of my students except earlier ones runs natural and direct game. You would find those who runs natural and direct game has natural advantages. They often are good looking, strong positive sterotypes. What happens was they take short cuts. Their students can’t relate. Since i’m very short and skinny. But able to get it done in game. All my findings and results helps people with higher LMS than me. I am the most relatable daygamer ever. The pareto principle suggest 20% of your focus gives you 80% of the results. Luckly my focus using my smaller frame has given me the pareto principle to my students. Whatever works for me, will work twice as good for them. While other taller coaches, what works though their positive sterotype body. It won’t work for others. My style sounds natural sounding. But is very tactical. Authetic communication flows out of it. Every girl is different, you adapt to her. But there is a natural sounding structure to it.

LMS or looks, money status is a huge part of game. I’m not going to lie to you unlike most coaches who said looks don’t matter. Looks in terms of protector status and preselection does matter. It gets you compliance. Money gives you a pull location and survival value. It matters to have a good pull location. Also, you need money for relationships. If you want to keep the girl around. Money can get you nicer clothing which show more status. But honestly, there is a social status hierachy. White students do have it easier when taller, preselected and has protector status. Yes taller students does have an advantage over shorter students. Muscles do matter a lot in daygame in Vancouver. The reason was for women, they need two jobs to live in Vancouver. It is the highest cost of living city in North America. So they don’t need a guy for their survival value anymore. Women can take care of themselves. This isn’t the 60’s. So they often look for really tall strong guys who has replication value. Look around you, you can see this in downtown.

The other 25% that didn’t pull were just hardcase newbies. Who were shorter, stubborn, unchanging. Even some of them pulled. Some students are totally uncoachable. I used to teach natural and direct. Which added to that percentage. I dropped that style of teaching when my students were getting rejected over it. Direct game is about value. If you are a positive sterotype, you will come across as high value. If you are a lower value short skinny Asian guy. You would be like a beggar asking for change. She doesn’t percieve the compliment as high value. But the madness is other PUAs running this over and over again. Just to drop out of game.

Train with me, the most relatable coach who will get you results. I have trained hardcase students and I know how to teach them. Most coaches just knows how to take thier money. I have a leave no man behind mentality. I might be Asian, but most of my students are of every other ethnicity or mixed. I rarely train Asians tbh. Just a few. I’m not sure why but I don’t question it. I feel other ethnicity of students relates to me better. Regardless, even the results surprises me. I can post testimonials. I have them all on screenshots. I don’t just get a few like other dating coaches. I have a lot weekly of progress reports. Unlike other dating coaches who has very mediocre results for students. As a teacher, you are only as good as your students.

-GD