Everyone’s talking about BLUE ORGINS ROCKET WENT INTO ORBIT AGAIN, right?
We all know that Jeff Bezos just landed their space rocket Blue Orgins today.
YOU NEED AN 80 I.Q TO READ THIS POST, SO THE PEOPLE WHO ARE ADHD FUCKS I MOVED TO THE INNER CIRCLE, YOU DON’T HAVE TO READ THIS, SINCE YOU ARE TOO ADHD TO CAUSE YOU ARE STUPID….
If Latino Jeff Bezos can get a rocket to sub orbital twice, yet one of my Latino student can’t even finish the 14 video playlist…. quickly before I got rid of him from Elite Access.. wtf..
This was the star trek actor long time ago, Captain Kirk, who plays a captain on a starship. T.v Was fictional, but now he has done it for real, which is really cool
I woke up then had a revelation when I saw this cock rocket… so I wanted to make a post sharing it.
But what almost no one understands about daygame is the concept of Elon’s Musk, John Elite’s first principles beats the Occams Razer concept of simplification.
I watched this video since it was linked to it, then realized this is exactly how I think. His 5 principles. Its fucking weird I understand everything he says. It makes so much sense to me
THERE WAS 5 STEPS TO ELON MUSK PROCESS, BUT IT IS IDENTICAL TO MINE IN DESIGNING MY DAYGAME SYSTEMS, TECHNOLOGIES, WHICH IS A COINCIDENCE
1 Make requirements less dumb
2 Delete part/process
3 Simplify/optimize (don’t optimize something that shouldn’t exist)
4 Accelerate cycle time
5 Automate
It’s not technical game, or optimizing things, or they are engineers, or the Occams Razor simplification is the key that helps you get laid for daygame.
Most people doesn’t care about tinder, since that doesn’t count since it requires no social intelligence where most of their students are white, so they hide that covering their stupid tinder testimonials where you can no longer verify their race,
it’s the first principles the fundemental truths, Not reason by analogy, saying Mystery said this, or RSD said that, or Justin Wayne said this, Self proclaimed high laycounts guy said this.
ELON MUSK BELIEVES YOU SHOULDN’T REASON BY ANALOGY BECAUSE SOME PAST GURU SAID THIS OR THAT. BUT YOU SHOULD IGNORE ALL OF THAT, THEN BUILD FROM THE GROUNDS UP LIKE I HAVE NOT LIMITED OR CONSTRAINT BY THE PAST TO COME UP WITH NEW SOLUTIONS
- ABCS of low self esteem also uses reasoning by analogy, Mystery said this or that, a derivative.
- Only 6 laid testimonials, added extra steps like stupid Asian you are enough brainwashing. Much like RSD, but the Asian equivalent.
- They go direct for daygame, thinking it is more masculine. Stupid.
- They dress like shit in a daygame, not helpful.
- They even made daygame so structured, technical, they forgot the behavioral game which is the strategy. They aren’t adaptive.
Also, Elon Musk 5 principles for engineering which I also use.
1. Make the requirements less dumb
2. Delete parts of the process
3. Simplify, optimize (don’t optimize something that shouldn’t exist, like the Mystery Method used for daygame or romance into romantic sexual when I have way more Asian laid testimonials, 34+ vs 5)
4. Accelerate cycle time
5. Automate.
And that can happen even if you can’t stop worshipping other dating coaches with less student results than me, that are going against Elon Musk principles for rocket science, also first principles,
as long as you’re also start applying the first principles, the fundamental truths.
You just need to deal with objections, sexualize it later, maneuver her home, pull, escalate her at home, go for instadate, find out 30 things about her, flirt touch up to level 5 or you have to use alcohol to deal with the objections.
Or emotional objections goes against the principle don’t optimize something that shouldn’t exist
Hey, did you know that the first principles concept is simple, Even Elon Musk 5 principles for engineering. Since my daygame system is identical to it. 489 laid/pull testimonials for daygame
So what is First Principles, or Elon Musk 5 Engineering principles?
1. Make requirements less dumb
2. Delete part/process
3. Simplify/optimize (don’t optimize something that shouldn’t exist)
4. Accelerate cycle time
5. Automate?
It’s debunks everything else in the daygame industry, also shows how flawed their thinking process is, opinions as facts, delusional, status maxing, value denying they are which gets so many people stuck worshipping status maxing from value deniers, half truth Machiavellian dating coaches
I am a daygame coach with the most laid/pull testimonials in the world for daygame, 489 now.
They have 5 – 7 Asian laid testimonials the most,
the least 0 (Kraprisma King) or 1 Token Asian (Justin Wayne) for daygame who has 489 laid/pull testimonials.
So, right now, I’m going to share with you 5 principles that debunks everything else in the daygame industry,
also shows how flawed their thinking process is,
opinions as facts, delusional, status maxing, value denying…
….and how you can realize you have been following fundamentally flawed systems that is delusional, opinions as facts, autistic
While some has laid testimonials for daygame, why do they have only a fraction of mine?
…even if you combine every other daygame system in the world together, put all their laid testimonials together.
LETS DUNK THINGS LETS START WITH THE FIRST PRINCIPLES
So the first thing is, Occam’s razer is a very flawed principle or concept for daygame, vs the First Principles of Elon Musk or what I use for the fundamental truths 20/35….
The big idea here is You should not use the occams Razer concept unless you have reasoned by first priniples.
Self proclaimed high laycounts guy, reasoned by analogy, saying Mystery said this, mystery said that.
Which is already fundamentally flawed.
It already goes against the first of the 5 principle of Elon Musk, making things less dumb. But I’ll get into that later.
This is important because Mystery isn’t a daygamer, no daygame infields.
That is a night game system which actually works for night game.
That is reasoning by analogy.
Kind of like how Elon Musk told him batteries are expensive, just use normal cars instead of Electric vehicles.
So he asked what are the parts of a battery? then put it together, make it himself reasoning by first principles, figuring out the solutions from the grounds up. Rather than reason by analogy..
LETS GO OVER THE 5 PRINCIPLES
I won’t talk down to you, trying to sound smart, these are Elon Musk principles. We both use it, we don’t talk down to people trying to sound smart. I can translate what’s in my brain to you… unless you are a dumb zombie I kicked out of Elite Access, then you are too dumb..
So principle #, 1 Make requirements less dumb.
The big idea here is you should believe you are 99% wrong, you want to be 98, 97.
Generally sociopaths has opinions as facts for their thinking patterns.
I’m not saying that of him, I’m saying generally that’s how they think. OPINIONS AS FACTS, NOT FACTS AS OPINIONS LIKE MY STUDENT LAID TESTIMONIALS…
By using Mystery Method as a foundation, it is already 100% dumb.
ABCS of Low Self Esteem and Self proclaimed high laycounts guy are a Mystery Method derivative.
A system they made from Mystery’s night game system.
Jay Tea Train only has 6 laid testimonials for daygame.
Self proclaimed high laycounts guy has 3. 2 from his products during Covid 19, which is funny since other dating coaches courses besides mine and his doesn’t work at all, 0 laid testimonials.
Maybe he had a big audience, 2 white guys got laid allegedly.
However only one student got laid from daygame from his 8 week mentorship as he reads a screenshot without showing the lay unlike my students.
This debunks another principle later on for the 4th principle, which i’ll get into.
But reasoning by analogy is already dumb.
I got his former 5’5 Indian student laid social circle gathering, similar to daygame that he couldn’t for his 8 week mentorship program who has less value.
Then again other Sri Lankan taller stronger fictional dating coaches has only 6 Indian laid testimonials, only one from India, so why worship?
Isn’t that… DUMB? (bhenchoding)
This is important because I made it less dumb by being mentored by a dozen naturals, plus fields testing, split testing every single daygame, discarding 99% of the autistic zombie bullshit.
When its field-tested, it is then split tested to other students. Not just field tested on a tall white or black washed, then taught. Leading to 489 laid/pull testimonials.
I just got a few more during the Delta Variant,
most can’t even get their first laid testimonial for Covid 19 for the products.
Neither did their old products, except mine still works, since you are dumb, worshipping, being funneled into a bootcamp by design with confusing half truth technical concepts that are dumb, while they are status maxing, value denying at the same time.
The principles # 2 is Delete part/process.
The main thing to understand here is that Romance has nothing to do with daygame. Unless you are a taller white, black washed negro looking person.
Justin Wayne figured reasoning by analogy that in a social circle, people will hug first, then hold hands, then eventually kiss over the months then say I like you, do you like me? Samepagology.
But not everyone fits into a boyfriend girlfriend frame in a social circle, which is first principles.
By using samepagology if you don’t fit into the boyfriend girlfriend frame, you will be auto rejected or friendzoned on the spot…
He doesn’t even have many Black laid testimonials, one was his instructor. But that’s it.
That’s why you should stop worshipping dating coaches your own race as the only option. Go with the one with the most Asian laid testimonials for daygame, most for your race, which I have way more of Asians, Indians than them for daygame. Also, overall daygame laid testimonials.
What does worshipping has to do with anything? That is why you shouldn’t worship
Sometimes people hooks up, then often, then she ask what are we? Then you can say boyfriend girlfriend, working with the first principles. So you don’t need ROMANCE
He does have one Asian guy married who is good looking who does fit into boyfriend material. He can use samepagology.
That’s the token Asian, the exception to the rule
But I have a lot of students married without using any romance whatsoever.
I deleted so much unnecessary bullshit. Elon Musk said delete more so you have to bring back 10%. I never had to bring this back at all or even teach this mental bullshit idealistic thinking crap
I got rid of the hand holding too, its too romantic. But I never needed to bring it back.
I focused on seeding the maneuver, seeding the sexuality to the max, objection looping to the max instead of just escalating.
It was always part of the system.. its the only thing that works for my students, short Asian guys too, since I have so many of the students.
Or using the 3 second rule to approach,
or squaring off like a nightclub since they reason by analogy that it is manly, since London Daygame, Simple Pickup also uses it.
Or when they say its manly to give compliments, or validation.
These could be cut out as unnecessary pieces that shouldn’t be optimized… since Todd V only has 3 daygame laid testimonials tied with self proclaimed high laycounts guy. Setting the bar low with mental bullshit which already broke the first rule, be less dumb.
This means less is more.
Whatever zombie game components you can cut out, the better.
It not a minimalistic game overwise a newbie will dominate daygame.
It means, there are unnecessary pieces that kills laid testimonials, so they won’t reach the same amount as my students based on direct, validation, romance.
Basically like winning the small battle, but losing the war concept. They are giving up the big victory for winning the small battles with this mental bullshit that should be cut out. That is levelling their game down…
Also the students used to use OMEGA 369 for ADHD. It is like a wingman, not like the new supplement which affects the PUA itself.
The omega 3 is helpful when you are hungry, want to eat fatty foods, great for fasting.
That 10% that I cut, is brought back for another purpose.
I’m not afraid to discard, or cut things. This is not opinions as facts. It wasn’t as optimal for ADHD, so it gets cut, repurposed to another area of intermitting fasting which this reduces your cravings.
The principle # 3 Simplify/optimize (don’t optimize something that shouldn’t exist) .
Romance is something that shouldn’t exist for daygame, it is putting another algorithm for no reason. Then adding romantic sexual.
It doesn’t even need to be there, unless you are such a positive looking white washed black washed stereotype that they will use it.
It lead to 5 Asian laid testimonials for daygame, 6 Indians at most.
Only a small select few can use it. It shouldn’t exist. Its going against first principles if the sexual connection is more than enough that the women will fall for the guy afterwards.
But adding extra pieces for no good reason, isn’t going to get as many laid testimonials as I would. This is a fact, something I always disagreed with, romance..
This is key because its like validation, it doesn’t need to be there or optimized. Like even the way you say it, or what frame it comes from doesn’t matter.
Giving validation by itself is a low value act.
Its like a homeless person giving validation, while raising her value.
Without status maxing, this wouldn’t work in a million years, creating an extra unnecessary step for no good reason to be cockblocked for lower SMV guys.
Some steps aren’t necessary, like depending on funnels if you don’t same day lay.
But they depend on it too much dismissing same day lays, while they only have 1 laid testimonial from their 8 week mentorship program for daygame.
So this whole funnels is an unnecessary extra step that is optimizing something that shouldn’t be optimized.
Unlike night game or tinder, the women in daygame aren’t down to fuck.
Its better to have a good instagram with my secret 6 algorithms which creates conversions. Even if they are getting leads.
They believe that if they have one picture she doesn’t like, they get cockblocked.
But with 6 algorithms, its like a killzone, ambush, she automatically converts. Much like how they would use dj videos of themselves. A conversion mechanism.
Then you can retarget her later over time, like an email list, where you update, eventually warming her up.
But most of my students doesn’t need Instagram or the 6 algorithms. Except the old man, few other students with lower SMV. But even if I optimized this step, its unnecessary.
My students should just focus on same day lays instead, keep her on the line with social calibrations, social skills, proper text game.
Not the ask her out quickly as fast as possible, tinder isn’t daygame. My black student made that mistake, same with the Indian student. They have to correct it. Reel her up slowly like a fish.
Also every text has to be like copywriting, a headline, she has to reply, it has to hook, over and over. Like what you read in the national enquirer newspaper or tabloids at the supermarket where you pick that up to read it.
Not just writing big ass text thinking she is busy because its some tinder generation bullshit which isn’t true since my students copy and paste my text over and over.
Or writing shorter text which doesn’t hook her, for the sake of writing smaller text. Since even for copywriting, even short headlines can hook people to read the entire sales letter.
This also becomes another unnecessary step trying to optimize it.
My students copy and paste my text, the women always comes out, even if my students are 5’3 during Covid 19
So the next principle is # 4 Accelerate cycle time
The big idea here is you shouldn’t depend on funnels which ADDS MORE TIME, OR A DELAYED DEFEAT… that 10% she is coming out bullshit talking about leads, volume, conversions since they only have 1 laid testimonial for that funnel for their 8 week mentorship program, 2 for their products.
It also doesn’t mean go faster using funnels, more volume for daygame, that is like digging your own grave if there is only 3 laid testimonials to back up this bullshit theory.
While it may seem smart to the zombies, for daygame you require more social calibrations, social skills to speed up that lay.
Night game requires less social skills,
Tinder none, so their laid testimonials doesn’t really count, neither does tinder laid testimonials count for student results. its just displaying white turkey on the shelves then women likes it, so it sells faster.
So they cover the faces of their student results, so you can’t verify its mostly 95% white turkeys metaphorically speaking.
It clearly is idealistic thinking, not proof based thinking..
This is important because its like high ticket sales. You want to close it during that day.
Rather than emailing them, retargeting them over and over.
In this case put them through a text sequence with huge volume. Which didn’t even work for their daygame students except 3. Its not efficient
They say it is like sales, or poker. But that is like saying for sales they are selling a better product, white turkey meat, metaphorically speaking. Which doesn’t count in my books. Its like a food app.
Most of their tinder laid testimonials are white people where they cover their face.
You get less compliance that way if you do this for daygame as time goes on since you are at the mercy of the 10% stat which is a bogus.
My Pakistani mentor has 95% of the women coming out, if he can get her phone number, mixed with his behavioral game..
Since my students copy and paste my text, the women comes out with my text game! even if the student was 5’3.
I actually read them out before on Youtube Live what I told them to text.
The last principle # 5 is Automate.
The big idea here is Elon Musk called it the end of the line testing, if things works well enough for his production line, its fine.
You don’t need IN process testing.
Which means trying to fix certain points early on since that can create false positives of what is wrong.
But it doesn’t work properly at the end of the line testing since it is mostly white students, so they are already covering the faces of the white students.
I could be wrong, but allegedly, there are like one indian, 2 blacks, one middle eastern, mostly whites for the testimonials. Just a rough estimation
Now we can’t verify since everything is cut out, its speculation.
This is important because You don’t automate until you do some quick testing, why the other minorities aren’t getting results.
I looked over the 5’5 Indian former student, he is writing like what are you looking for on Tinder, I’m looking for the same thing, then trying to get her out whatsapp.
No lays, until I taught him!
I taught him how to conduct the date, which they need to go back to the drawing board.
He used my seed the maneuver, seed the sexuality, objections dealing, to lay.
I taught him how to close in the bedroom without alcohol, which is related to what I said earlier.
He got 2 lays in a row.
He is the Indian guy on the left. 2 lays.
Strangely when the guy on the right, bald Indian guy tried to blackwash his profile for seeking arrangements lead gen, no money paid. He dressed white washed, but tried to change his ethnicity to black, then he got laid right away automatically.
He didn’t get results for so long more than a decade.
I don’t count online shit as laid testimonials.
THIS CHINESE STUDENT LEARNED THE 6 ALGORITHMS TO PUT ON HIS INSTAGRAM ONLY MY INNER CIRCLE MEMBERS KNOWS ABOUT. HE USED SELF PROCLAIMED HIGH LAYCOUNTS GUYS TEXT GAME. BUT PUMPING THEM OR THE VOLUME THROUGH MY 6 ALGORITHMS. HE GOT 59 LAYS THROUGH MY INSTAGRAM SECRETS. OTHERWISE IT WOULD OF BEEN A LAY OR TWO HERE AND THERE.
Afterwards on Skype, also I moved him to the inner circle. He learned how to close in the bedroom with the new physical pressure and release formula, along with my 5 elements strategies.
I can’t talk about it, since I keep a lot of stuff top secret.
No alcohol necessary to close
But I don’t count the 59 lays, even if the bedroom stuff helped taught to me by a 5’4 Pakistani mentor a shorter one in Vancouver. There is a lot of new technologies.
I only counted the bar game, that one time.
While he didn’t get results daygame which is strange, he can’t seem to emote well, so women doesn’t know if he was flirting or not, so when he pulled, they were caught off guard. But he found his niche on Tinder.
It was all worth it, I helped him with his last piece of his training. He came back afterwards going from one coach to another, all said the same thing I did.
2019 he got a girlfriend from daygame. At first she didn’t respond. But I fixed his instagram, 6 algorithms, women were begging to meet up. That women he met from daygame came out. I taught him how to close, switching frames from sexual, which got her slightly opened up, then switched again to husband material, then she opened up.
After 6 lays in a row, she asked what are we
He said boyfriend and girlfriend I guess.
So romance wasn’t necessary, which was an extra step as I said.
OF COURSE LATER ON, HE BANGED A 21 YEAR OLD 8.5/10, THEN A 25 YEAR OLD 7.6/10 in 2021
He done this though Kaizen, not through the funnel like before, paired with an instagram.
It was all purely social calibrations, social skills.
It wasn’t easy, the training was too brutal, if you saw how I trained him, getting him to pinch his nipples if he fucked up, its maybe sadistic.
They say its all strategies, its all game. But that is a lie, since their students are mostly white for results. Mostly.
Its like for sales if that was a strategy, their white students was a better product if they are most of the laid testimonials. Which imo tinder doesn’t even count, doesn’t count as laycounts either.
If it was poker, for strategy, they had more chips than some of the minorities.
I helped one of them there even the odds.
In reality, I am simply much smarter, higher I.Q.
Elon Musk 5 step principles of engineering, Also, first principles debunked that as being the most optimized, even debunks the Occams Razer concept.
Hope you learned something.
This post took me a long time to write, to think about.
IF I WERE TO MAKE CHANGES TO THIS AUTOMATED FLOW CHART HE USES, 14 OBJECTION. I GET THE WOMEN COMING OUT TO MEET MY STUDENTS EVEN AT 5’3. IT WOULDN’T WORK FOR HIM
There is a better objections formula or algorithm.
Statements of empathy, I acknowledge that you X = objection, but… Y = keep looping.
This is more adaptive, you can have 1400 objections dealing with a single algorithm like algebra. Or physics equations.
Maybe at certain times like anti lock brakes, the algorithms will take over, not a rigid structure for the flowchart if I were to rebuild it, along with using the 6 algorithms. So even minorities has a conversion mechanism.
I’m teaching the Indian guy how to text properly. If you are white, you can just get her to whatsapp quickly, or ask her out quickly through volume.
Same with the black student right now.
Its opening their eyes to what text game really is, the daygame version.
But for the 5’5 Indian, you can’t, you need more optimizations, plus if he used the 6 algorithms, his matches will be through the roof, doing the automatic conversions.
Too bad he is a bit lazy to get those pics for the 6 algorithms. Only taught in the inner circle or my bootcamps. Nobody else.
-John Elite
P.S, I wrote this in a simple way, I didn’t want to sound too complicated for the sake of confusing people to sound smart. This is smart, you don’t need to sound smart. If this makes sense to you, your subconscious brain, then you know it is correct since it is proof based thinking, with my student results to back it all up.
If it sounds smart, but is confusing, then everything goes towards game, then it is idealistic thinking, trying to gaslight you with half truths.
I could be super technical too, but I don’t want to scare people away, talk down to them, confuse them. I like to retranslate everything so you understand it. Elon Musk does the same.
WORLD'S BEST TOP EXPERT DAYGAME COACH 582 LAID/PULL TESTIMONIALS ONLY 