My Response: Ivan Stratienco (Amazing Ivan) Reddit Smear Campaign, Contradictions & Receipts

IF YOU ARE CURIOUS HOW THE REDDIT SMEAR CAMPAIGN WAS WRITTEN AND ITS STRUCTURE KNOWING ITS FAKE. 1. FALSE ACCUSATIONS 2. GUILT TRIP 3. PAIN POINTS 4. CIRCULAR ARGUEMENT. THIS IS CALLED THE NARCISSISTIC WORD SALAD.

So, if you decide to Google my name, you might stumble upon a Reddit โ€œreviewโ€ or warning about John Elite… posted by Ivan Stratienco (Amazing Ivan) before you even check out my site, John Elite.

But hereโ€™s the thing, itโ€™s not really a review.

Ivan Stratienco hasnโ€™t actually taken the full course…

he just dabbled with the Elite Access but skipped the whole Elite Bundle Resurrections.

Whatโ€™s going on here?

Itโ€™s kind of a sneaky tactic, pre-suasion, if you will.

Amazing Ivan is trying to turn you off before you even get the chance to meet me.

It feels like heโ€™s aiming to sway 777,000 people on Reddit, hoping to stop others from listening to me or paying for my coaching.

Honestly, Iโ€™d encourage you to watch the video all the way through.

Itโ€™s got some screenshot evidence that really lays it all out about Ivan Stratienco (Amazing Ivan) and the real story behind the Reddit smear campaign.

Iโ€™m speeding through this so you can get the info quickly!

โ€œA smear campaign is a planned effort to discredit a person or group and tarnish their reputation.โ€ Psychology Today
โ€œSmear campaigns involve manipulationโ€ฆ often a behavior of malignant narcissists and those with NPD or antisocial personality disorder.โ€ (patterns, not diagnoses) Psychology Today
โ€œThose recruited by the abuser become an entourage known as โ€˜flying monkeys.โ€™โ€ Psychology Today

IF YOU ARE CURIOUS HOW THE REDDIT SMEAR CAMPAIGN WAS WRITTEN AND ITS STRUCTURE KNOWING ITS FAKE. 1. FALSE ACCUSATIONS 2. GUILT TRIP 3. PAIN POINTS 4. CIRCULAR ARGUEMENT. THIS IS CALLED THE NARCISSISTIC WORD SALAD.

1) Admission + Rage Quit = Hypocrisy

IF YOU ARE CURIOUS HOW THE REDDIT SMEAR CAMPAIGN WAS WRITTEN AND ITS STRUCTURE KNOWING ITS FAKE. 1. FALSE ACCUSATIONS 2. GUILT TRIP 3. PAIN POINTS 4. CIRCULAR ARGUEMENT. THIS IS CALLED THE NARCISSISTIC WORD SALAD.

So, Ivan Stratienco messaged me saying, โ€œYour system obviously can work very well.โ€

But then, just 14 days later, Ivan Stratienco rage-quit.

Funny enough, that was the same day another student whos Chinese was boasting about 15 lays, 5 models, 2 actresses, and even marriage then became a father to a daughter.

Ivan called himself โ€œthin-skinned.โ€

-But online? Ivan Stratienco (Amazing Ivan) switches it up: โ€œdidnโ€™t get laid, didnโ€™t pull.โ€ Honestly, how can you rage-quit after just two weeks and then say the system failed?

That feels like hypocrisy to me.

Plus, Ivan Stratienco (Amazing Ivan) never even checked out the digital courses in the Elite Bundle Resurrections.

He only went through the Elite Access, as I had mentioned in the screenshot since I hadnโ€™t let him start that yet. So, really, how can Ivan Stratienco give a fair review that doesnโ€™t come off as just a hit piece?

2) Initial Contact = Proof of Emotional Blindness


So, Amazing Ivan, or Ivan MIchaels starts off saying, โ€œI feel like Iโ€™m a hard caseโ€ฆ depressedโ€ฆ ghostedโ€ฆ ignored.โ€ Right?

But then, in a later Reddit rant, heflips the script, claiming he wasnโ€™t really depressed at all.

He even throws around terms like โ€œgaslitโ€ and โ€œlabeled.โ€ Talk about a contradiction!

Honestly, when someone like Ivan Stratienco calls themselves a โ€œhard caseโ€ but then refuses to take any responsibility or even own their words, itโ€™s a bit of a red flag.

In my experience, thatโ€™s usually a sign theyโ€™re not really coachable.

It follows a pattern Iโ€™d describe as unteachable, you know, that dismissive, narcissistic vibe with a serious lack of self-awareness.

Itโ€™s frustrating, to say the least.

3) Voice Playback = Emotional Disconnect


So, when I played it back forAmazing Ivan, I mentioned that his tone felt pretty flat.

And, get this, Ivan said, โ€œI tried to mimic Joe Roganโ€ฆ guess not.โ€

Like, he totally admitted it right there! But the wild part? Ivan Stratienco didnโ€™t even realize it himself.

Honestly, to me, that kind of feels like emotional blindness.

Itโ€™s like Ivan Stratienco is just not in tune with how he sounds or even aware of his own slip-ups.

Later on, Ivan turned it around and called it โ€œgaslighting,โ€ but come on, the proof is there, he was the one who said it first!

4) Progress & Quit = Not Enough to Change Habits


So, hereโ€™s the deal: Amazing Ivan recorded 12 drills and 17 approaches over a span of 14 days.

Iโ€™ve got the chart right here…lots of gaps and some missed check-ins from Ivan Stratienco.

And get this, Ivan even said, โ€œWhy do I have to check in every day?โ€

Honestly, I think habits donโ€™t just magically change with a hit-or-miss effort.

When you throw in the towel before youโ€™ve even laid a solid foundation, itโ€™s not really a sign of failure.

Itโ€™s more like a way for Ivan Stratienco (Amazing Ivan) to dodge the hard work. You know what I mean?

5) NDA + $400 Goodwill = Breach Without Remorse


So, Ivan Stratienco went ahead and signed a non-disparagement NDA, right? Took the $400 goodwill payment, too. But then, what did Ivan do? He just ignored the whole thing and started smearing anyway.

After that, Ivan Stratienco posted some statements that honestly seem to contradict that agreement.

I canโ€™t really know what Amazing Ivan was thinking, but I just wanted to point out that there’s a clear inconsistency here.

6) Scope of Access = Not a Full Program Review

So, hereโ€™s the thing: Amazing Ivan never actually got into the Elite Bundle Resurrections, and he didnโ€™t even touch the digital courses that come with it.

His whole experience was just with Elite Access.

Honestly, I think calling that a review of my entire system is pretty misleading on Ivan Stratiencoโ€™s part.

Now, letโ€™s talk about the supplements.

Ivan Stratienco claims theyโ€™re โ€œirresponsible prescriptions.โ€

But thatโ€™s totally off base. I donโ€™t prescribe anything!

These are just over-the-counter options you can grab on Amazon.

Theyโ€™re optional, nothing more. Over-the-counter stuff isnโ€™t the same as a prescription.

Funny enough, Ivan Stratienco (Amazing Ivan) didnโ€™t even use the supplements.

He accidentally ordered them twice!

Both orders just sat there unopened.

When I talked to Ivan on the phone, he mentioned, โ€œIโ€™d rather get everything from foodโ€ฆ Iโ€™m worried about side effects,โ€ and, by the way, heโ€™s a vegetarian.

Later, Ivan Stratienco twisted this around to say itโ€™s โ€œdeath by supplements.โ€

But hereโ€™s the catch: the situation he pointed to involved a lung clot, not a stroke.

I mean, a stroke is all about the brain, right? Totally different thing!

And talk about hypocrisy! IAmazing Ivan has a credit in a vegetarian-themed movie called โ€œMeatless BBQโ€ from 2018, yet here he is bashing supplements he never even tried.

So, letโ€™s break it down: Ivan Stratienco is anti-supplement, has never used them, and is pushing a misrepresented medical claim. Sounds more like an outrage narrative than any solid evidence to me.


8) Bans: The Truth

So, hereโ€™s the deal: the claim that he was โ€œstuck in limbo with weeks of bans and no coachingโ€? Honestly, thatโ€™s just not true.

He only had a 3-day accountability ban, which is actually pretty lenient compared to what others might face.

And let me tell you, I hardly ever ban students. Like, maybe one indefinite ban a year, if that. Most of the time, the bans we do have are pretty short…

usually just 1 to 2 weeks, tops.

When they come back, theyโ€™re usually more focused and ready to go, not just sitting around feeling lost.

In fact, most students donโ€™t get banned at all. Seriously, most of them donโ€™t struggle with attention or avoidance issues, so they keep making progress without any hiccups.

-Itโ€™s kind of wild how a simple, short reset got twisted into this whole narrative about โ€œpermanent bans.โ€


IF YOU ARE CURIOUS HOW THE REDDIT SMEAR CAMPAIGN WAS WRITTEN AND ITS STRUCTURE KNOWING ITS FAKE. 1. FALSE ACCUSATIONS 2. GUILT TRIP 3. PAIN POINTS 4. CIRCULAR ARGUEMENT. THIS IS CALLED THE NARCISSISTIC WORD SALAD.

9) Testimonials: Straight Numbers

My other student 100 lays, counts as one instance, 1 to the number. Otherwise won’t the laid testimonials be 767 by now? Not 667?


So, hereโ€™s the deal: the claim from Amazing Ivan or Ivan Micheals that he was โ€œstuck in limbo with weeks of bans and no coachingโ€? Honestly, thatโ€™s just not true.

Ivan Stratienco only had a 3-day accountability ban, which is actually pretty lenient compared to what others might face.

And let me tell you, I hardly ever ban students. Like, maybe one indefinite ban a year, if that. Most of the time, the bans we do have are pretty short…

usually just 1 to 2 weeks, tops. When they come back, theyโ€™re usually more focused and ready to go, not just sitting around feeling lost.

In fact, most students donโ€™t get banned at all.

Seriously, most of them donโ€™t struggle with attention or avoidance issues, so they keep making progress without any hiccups.

– Itโ€™s kind of wild how a simple, short reset for Ivan Stratienco (Amazing Ivan) got twisted into this whole narrative about โ€œpermanent bans.โ€ overcounting and โ€œa few studentsโ€ driving totals; thatโ€™s inaccurate.

Why this happens (my view)

Quote (Psychology Today, โ€œword saladโ€):

โ€œโ€ฆa slang term for a type of narcissistic speech that is purposefully confusing. Listeners find โ€˜narcissistic word saladโ€™ frustrating because the speaker uses circular reasoning, outright lies, denial, or mischaracterizations of past events to avoid being wrong or taking responsibility.โ€


In my opinion, thatโ€™s what youโ€™re seeing here… false-sounding claims, guilt trips, pain-point jabs, and circular argumentsโ€ฆ designed to confuse, not to find truth.

Quote (Psychology Today, smear campaigns):

โ€œPeople who run smear campaigns feel wronged and seek to punish. They paint the victim as the abuser, recruit allies to push the narrative, and aim to control the story and rewrite history. Itโ€™s character assassination meant to damage reputation and โ€˜winโ€™.โ€

IF YOU ARE CURIOUS HOW THE REDDIT SMEAR CAMPAIGN WAS WRITTEN AND ITS STRUCTURE KNOWING ITS FAKE. 1. FALSE ACCUSATIONS 2. GUILT TRIP 3. PAIN POINTS 4. CIRCULAR ARGUEMENT. THIS IS CALLED THE NARCISSISTIC WORD SALAD.

-John Elite (Best Daygame Coach In The World)

P.S, you can get the course for low as $1, if you’re really broke. No excuses.

HERE ARE SOME RECENT TESTIMONIALS FROM MY STUDENTS. I HAVE MORE BUT. THESE ARE THE MOST RECENT POSTED. I COULD POST OVER 60 MORE NEW ONES ON TOP OF THE OLD ONES I HAVE.