99 views, 100 views equals new video
Phil Jackson is widely recognized as an outstanding coach or the best in the world, excelling in guiding teams to success…
much like Steve Jobs did in leading teams to achieve remarkable results, despite not being a programming expert himself.
It’s evident that people are less interested in admiring individuals who employ questionable methods, such as using alcohol to get women drunk in their bootcamps and in their daygame life.
Such behaviors are often associated with cheating and a win-at-all-cost mentality, which goes against the values of fair play and integrity.
In various fields, including culinary arts and sports coaching, what matters most is the ability to deliver exceptional results.
Just as an Olympic coach doesn’t necessarily need to have won gold medals personally, a coach’s effectiveness is measured by their ability to consistently lead their team to victory.
Ultimately, people are seeking tangible results rather than a mentor to idolize.
The emphasis is on having a skilled leader,
like a general in terms of war, rather than necessarily being the most accomplished individual in the field or being a soldier.
Its like staying Steve Jobs is less valuable than Steve Wozniak since the latter of the two is a better programmmer.
But is he a better leader that would of led apple to where it is today?
Nope.
Consider a one-on-one competition where fairness is compromised by the use of substances like drugs like PEDs or alcohol.
People don’t have to compete against a cheater who is a violent sociopath with a win at all cost mentality who doesn’t feel guilt or remorse
it raises questions about the integrity of the competition.
It’s important to distance oneself from individuals with a win-at-all-cost mentality, as they may lack remorse or guilt and rationalize their actions.
This approach extends to using romance as a tool, which can lead people down an unhealthy path that doesn’t work for their daygame courses.
Then they get stuck, then needs an expensive bootcamp costing $5.6k a person.
Just to learn how to use alcohol maxing and escalating super hard.
The focus should be on achieving results, as demonstrated by my laid testimonials and accomplishments, rather than indulging in harmful practices.
Not every coach can achieve the prestigious status of a Michelin-starred restaurant or basketball championships, just as not every basketball player can become a successful coach.
Drawing parallels between being a skilled player and a competent coach, it’s clear that success in one doesn’t automatically translate to success in the other.
Each role has its own set of skills and requirements.
Just like a General and a soldier.
In coaching, the goal is to help individuals achieve success in daygame without the need for excessive worshipping or reliance on ineffective methods.
The emphasis is on providing value and achieving measurable outcomes rather than perpetuating harmful practices or manipulative behaviors of their team or students.
Ultimately, the measure of success lies in delivering results, not in perpetuating unhealthy practices.
The focus should be on becoming the best daygame coach, emphasizing ethical and effective strategies for success for their students…
rather than promoting shortcuts or questionable tactics.
Which steve will you pick?
One leads you to victory and more than anyone else.
Or one that is a bettter programmer but cheats the process and teaches that to their students? Using alcohol maxing bootcamps where they make 5.6k a head.
NEW VIDEO DROPPING AT 11AM PACIFIC TIME TODAY. CHECK IT OUT
World's BEST Daygame Coach with 672 Laid/Pull Testimonials. More Than Every Daygame Coach In The World Combined 